- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:40:22 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 20/05/2016 7:08, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > shapes-ISSUE-167 (implicit class scope): [EDITORIAL] implicit class scope gives impression of inferencing > > http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/167 > > Raised by: Dean Allemang > On product: > > An external comment https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016May/0000.html indicates problems with the wording in: > > 2.1.2.1 Implicit Class Scopes > > When, in the shapes graph, a shape is a SHACL instance of both sh:Shape and rdfs:Class the shape MUST get an implicit class scope of the class IRI and the sh:scopeClass triple MAY be omitted. > > ex:Person > a rdfs:Class, sh:Shape ; > sh:scopeClass ex:Person . #this triple can be omitted > > I suggest instead > > 2.1.2.1 Class Class Scopes > > When, in the shapes graph, a shape is a SHACL instance of both sh:Shape and rdfs:Class the shape is a class scope of itself. > > ex:Person > a rdfs:Class, sh:Shape ; Done. I have also added an example data graph and a short sentence explaining which node is in scope. Assuming this addresses your issue because I have used your suggested wording, I have closed the ticket. Holger > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2016 23:40:57 UTC