- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:50:53 +0100
- To: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/SPARQL11_and_RDF11 This is *really preliminary* mostly just pasting Andy's summary [1] in a wiki page which looks a bit like a spec doc... so, I left the action open for now... I guess it would be good to discuss this either per mail, or if time also in one of the next calls with regards to: - where does the RDF WG now stand on this? any further issues apart from the plain literal issue? - any other of our docs affected, how? and how to we propose to treat them? Any comments in this regard would be appreciated. Axel 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011AprJun/0390.html -- Dr. Axel Polleres axel.polleres@deri.org http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 13:51:33 UTC