- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:18:38 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Sunday, April 24, 2005, 6:27:45 PM, Bjoern wrote: BH> Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group, BH> From http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/script.html I BH> am concerned that the new SVG-specific features conflict with work the BH> HTML Working Group is chartered to develop as noted in XML Events, BH> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xml-events-20031014 section 3.5. It would BH> be most unfortunate if these mechanisms turn out to be different or even BH> incompatible such that e.g. a compound XHTML2+SVG document depends on BH> different scripting idioms. Yes, it would. You don't indicate specific areas of incompatibility so we can only respond in general terms. BH> Please explicitly request that the HTML BH> and CDF Working Group review this section. An official comment from both BH> Working Groups that the proposed features are consistent with work in BH> progress by the HTML Working Group would probably be satisfactory. We have asked the HTML WG to update XML Events to account for namespaced events; they have replied that they can start to do so once DOM 3 Events is in CR. The CDF WG is aware of the work in the SVG and HTML WGs, and tracks them closely, including shared WG membership and active participation in the Hypertext CG. While understanding your concern in general terms, we are not aware of a specific incompatibility. if you have noted one, please tell us about it. Failing which, we assume that this satisfies your comment. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 14:18:42 UTC