Re: Contacts API: remaining edits

To be clear, before we go to Last Call these items require editorial action, correct? 

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group




On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:52 AM, ext Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> As per my action-408, I've tried to find comments among Suresh's and
> mine that haven't been integrated in the Contacts API editors draft:
> * Suresh asked that revision, gender and timezone be removed, and the
> group resolved to do so
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Jun/att-0004/minutes-2011-06-01.html#item05
> 
> * the SHOULD and MAY in Appendix B need to be lowercased to not look
> normative (since the appendix isn't)
> 
> * the reference to OMA CAB with proposed text from Suresh at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011May/0061.html
> 
> * the photos field need to use URLs rather than free form strings (Robin
> has ACTION-407 to add that text)
> 
> * I think there was agreement to drop the "updatedSince" field (although
> I don't know that we took a formal resolution)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011May/0045.html
> 
> * my comment on the fact that the API refers to revokable permissions
> when it's not clear that we're using a permission model in the spec
> still stands; likewise regarding the existing of PERMISSION_DENIED_ERROR
> error code;
> 
> * the requirements that contact entries always contain .id,
> and .displayName or .name is still in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011May/0045.html
> I don't think we discussed it; at least there doesn't appear to have
> been follow up to my last message on this topic
> 
> Dom
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 14:04:09 UTC