- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:23:21 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Prioritised list of open issues http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/14 Which aggregates to include http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/16 Dealing with aggregates over mixed datatypes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/15 Extensibility of aggregate functions - Seems consensus on URI, less on whether DISTINCT should be allowed Issues where I think there is already consensus. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/3 Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces) - I've not heard anyone speaking against braces recently. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/4 What is the variable scope between main queries and subqueries? - Only projected variables have scope outside a subquery. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/12 Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause - Seems consensus on the post-aggregate FILTER being called. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/35 Can aggregate functions take DISTINCT as an argument a la SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ?X)? - Seems consensus on yes. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/36 What happens when expressions are projected with the same name as an existing variable? - Seems consensus on it being an error. -- Steve Harris, Garlik Limited 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK +44 20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 8 February 2010 10:23:51 UTC