- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:26:37 +0200
- To: Chris Pedigo <CPedigo@online-publishers.org>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Chris, yes, but it goes a bit further. My text puts a hint for later debates on responsibility. If a first party declares things as "same party", they take responsibility for those. If the other parties declared as "same" misbehave the semantics are such that this misbehavior is assigned also to the first party who had declared "same party" for the misbehaving site. This is to give people an incentive not to declare arbitrary third parties with lose relations as "same party" because this creates a liability risk. With my text, a site will only chose those as "same party" that they are in the same legal bucket and which they trust. Hope that helps Rigo On Friday 04 May 2012 11:15:32 Chris Pedigo wrote: > Rigo, thanks for taking this on. Is my understanding correct that this > language simply requires that a site may only claim affiliate sites as > long as those sites also honor DNT?
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 11:27:07 UTC