- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:14:18 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Edward W. Felten" <felten@cs.princeton.edu>
On Thursday 25 April 2013 13:36:32 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > However, this entire discussion seems to be ignoring our prior > decisions on ISSUE-4. If we are going to have requirements on the > configuration of a user preference, they need to be consistent with > the protocol expressed in TPE. So, at minimum, you have to > incorporate all of the options regarding how those preferences > might be set, as described in section 3 of TPE. > > The reason we have section 3 in TPE is because the semantics of a > header field are defined by how, why, and when that field is sent. > These cannot be separated from the protocol, since they are the > most important part of any protocol (syntax is often trivially > rearranged at the end of discussing what should be communicated). +1 --Rigo
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 00:14:47 UTC