Re: shapes-ACTION-43: Take a read through the spec and raise specific terminology issues as needed

> could you point me at the original emails so that we can keep track
> of our editing efforts?

These are in response to 
https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/142

there was concern about closing this issue raised on the public mailing
list, but I am following Issue 142 as my action

I have found the email regarding the closure of 142:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016Sep/0132.html

which we can reference if that's useful

is there something you want me to do with regard to this?

mark


On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:39:21 +1000
Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote:

> Thanks a lot, Mark. I have applied your pull request, with minor 
> editorial clean up.
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/compare/4cbf3f33c8...afaaeee264
> 
> - Note that <dfn> tags use data-lt for aliases, e.g. "solutions"
> instead of "solution". This then allows us to use the plural form in
> the <a>solutions</a> links. To test whether definitions are used
> correctly, simply open the local .html file in a browser and look for
> errors reported by ReSpec in the upper right corner.
> 
> - A couple of your edits to use binding instead of value were
> incorrect, because they were really about property values (e.g. of
> sh:ask), not solution bindings.
> 
> If your edits were in response to an external comment, e.g. those 
> recorded at
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Comments/September2016/
> 
> could you point me at the original emails so that we can keep track
> of our editing efforts?
> 
> Thanks again,
> Holger
> 
> 
> 
> On 18/10/2016 4:19, markh wrote:
> > Regarding:
> > "The spec uses different terminology from SPARQL where it is using
> > concepts from SPARQL. For example, the SHACL spec uses "row" where
> > SPARQL uses "solution", and "value" where SPARQL uses "binding"."
> >
> > I have found numerous references to SPARQL queries which discuss
> > 'value', in a way not related to SPARQL 'binding's (unsurprisingly)
> >
> > I have found a number of references to row, where it  may be better
> > to use 'solution'
> >
> > I have staged a PR:
> > https://github.com/marqh/data-shapes/pull/2
> >
> > illustrating updates to terminology and the text, to reflect my
> > thoughts.
> >
> > If this is of value and editorial, I can create a PR. If we need an
> > 'issue', and further discussion, then I can raise one.
> >
> > please advise?
> > thank you
> > mark
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:57:13 +0000
> > RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> shapes-ACTION-43: Take a read through the spec and raise specific
> >> terminology issues as needed
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/actions/43
> >>
> >> Assigned to: Mark Hedley
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 13:24:47 UTC