Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016

Sorry, you guys were still discussing names and the likes so I didn't get 
the impression it was ready for that. I'll add it to the agenda.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Software Group


Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote on 02/17/2016 02:54:15 PM:

> From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
> To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
> Date: 02/17/2016 02:55 PM
> Subject: Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016
> 
> I was expecting that 
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/92
> 
> would be back on the agenda; now that Arthur has created the 
> partition proposal we need to finalize it.
> 
> Holger
> 

> On 18/02/2016 8:42, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We will continue foraging through our list of remaining open issues,
> looking into several of them that have actually never been given 
> airtime. I'm not sure how many we will be able to cover, we'll go as
> far as we can.
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2016.02.18
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web 
> Technologies - IBM Software Group

Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2016 23:58:41 UTC