- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 05:26:22 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
I frobbed up some HTML and RDF/XML versions of the ns doc:
http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp.html
http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp.rdf
The /TR/ version has line feeds in 3 of the rdfs:comments so it is
currently invalid. I fixed this in ns/ldp.ttl by removing the line
feeds (vs. using long literals) to minimize impedance in old systems.
The /TR/ namespace claims that { : a owl:Ontology } (i.e.
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/ldp.ttl> or even
<http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/ldp.ttl>) is the ontology while the namespace
document claims that <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp> is the ontology. We can
fix this by adding an absolute path there.
The entities :MemberSubject, :PreferContainment, :PreferMembership and
:PreferEmptyContainer are stated to be of type rdf:Description. I
think that's not a legal use of rdf:Description and that they should
instead be owl:individuals. The Turtle and the RDF/XML differ because
only the Turtle versions asserts those type triples.
The HTML version uses a bit of CSS magic to create a hierarchy. It's
not beautiful, but it could be the start of something beautiful if
some folks have good presentation ideas. The HTML version uses CSS to
descriminate between classes and properties, and as with the RDF/XML,
there's no assertion of type rdf:Description.
--
-ericP
office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 09:26:53 UTC