Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

• From: Olaf Hartig <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
• Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:10:04 +0200
• To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <201106130810.07137.hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>

+1

Olaf


On Thursday 09 June 2011 22:27:34 Paul Groth wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
> proposal:
> 
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
> 
> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all
> process executions to specify a duration.
> 
> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
> 
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
> 
> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
> this proposal?
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul

Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 06:10:39 UTC