- From: Olaf Hartig <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:01:57 +0200
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
+1 Olaf On Monday 06 June 2011 10:22:30 Luc Moreau wrote: > Dear all, > > You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal > at the last teleconference: > "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us > to express the provenance > of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed > concerns, which can be > summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. > > After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged > towards a better > proposal: > > /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to > express the provenance of > an invariant view or perspective on a thing./ > > What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does > not change, the thing > itself can be mutable. > > To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for > this proposal? > > Best regards, > Luc
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 17:02:33 UTC