- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:12:07 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Leif Halvard Silli, Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:06:52 +0200: > Sam Ruby, Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:17:36 -0400: >> On 06/23/2010 11:52 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> The poll is available here, and will run starting at midnight EDT, and >>> run through Wednesday, May 19th. >> >> Correction: Wednesday, June 30th. > > More errors! > > The poll has errors in the second poll option: > > ]] 3. Objections to the Change Proposal to require user agents > ignore pragmas that specify multiple languages [[ > > What does this refer to? FIRSTLY: We do _not_ vote about how User > Agents are supposed to behave - but what should be considered valid. > SECONDLY: The subsequent link goes to a message from Ian about > @longdesc - and - THIRDLY - the link text _again_ talks as if it is > about how user agents should react: > > ]] We have a Change Proposal to keep the current text that > require user agents ignore pragmas that specify multiple > languages, discouraging the use of the pragma, encouraging > lang="" use instead, and explicitly requiring that > conformance checkers warn of this issue where relevant.. [[ > [*] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0308 Sorry, I meant to say that it points to this message, which indeed is about @longdesc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0393.html > None of the 3 change proposals will affect how user agents should > behave - all of them deal with what should be considered legal and what > kind of warnings there should be etc. > -- > leif halvard silli -- leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 19:12:40 UTC