- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:27:11 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Friday 6. November 2009 02:30:37 Axel Polleres wrote: > We didn't consider this particularly, OK! > but having the > WHERE part optional for a DELETE in that sense you propose > doesn't seem problematic to me, at first sight. Yeah, it breaks the earlier assumption that all variables needs to be bound in the WHERE clause, but since the value in this case will not be returned, it will simply be deleted, I think it looks like a nice way to resolve ISSUE-48. Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo kjetil@kjernsmo.net http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 09:27:52 UTC