Re: ISSUE-2256 (font-face-dtd): DTD allows <font-face> only as a child of <font> [SVG Full 1.1] from Cameron McCormack on 2009-04-07 (public-svg-wg@w3.org from April to June 2009)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:55:38 +1000
To: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
Cc: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090407115538.GA30322@arc.mcc.id.au>

Cameron McCormack:
> > The SVG 1.1 DTD allows <font-face> only as a child of <font>

Erik Dahlström:
> Really?
> 
> See http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#font_module_add_fontface (adds 'font-face' to SVG.Font.class in the spec).

Oops, should have checked the errata, sorry.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of ISSUE-2001 *** :)

> I think the DTD was correct, http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/svgdtd.html
> has 'font' and 'font-face' in SVG.Font.class as it should be, and
> SVG.Font.class seems to be included in all the elements that should
> have it (though it's not in SVG.Structure.class).

Indeed.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 11:56:26 UTC