- From: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:46:32 +0000
- To: Erik Hennum <ehennum@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Dear Erik, Thank you for your helpful comments. In response to the comment below: On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:20:03PM +0000, SWD Issue Tracker wrote: > > > ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/151 > > Raised by: Everyone > On product: All > > Raised by Erik Hennum in [1]: > > """ > Should the specification define skos:member as having a range of > skos:Concept or skos:Collection? Should skos:member have an inverse > skos:isMemberOf property? > """ We propose to state the range of skos:member as the union of skos:Concept and skos:Collection. We hope this will clarify the intended use of the SKOS collections framework. Is this acceptable? We have not encountered a requirement for an inverse of skos:member. We propose to make no change, can you live with this? Kind regards, Alistair Sean [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0103.html -- Alistair Miles Senior Computing Officer Image Bioinformatics Research Group Department of Zoology The Tinbergen Building University of Oxford South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3PS United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 09:47:16 UTC