- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:36:36 +1000
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hello WG. In the minutes of the 10 April 2008 telcon, there is the following: > XLink 1.1 LC … > AE: should we send LC comments? > > CL: we should read it and send a mail to them even if we have no > comments other than "it's ok" > ... is there a diffmarked version? > > ED: yes, linked from the forwarded mail there > > <ChrisL> 5.4 Locator Attribute (href) > > CL: one of the changes it that it's a LEIRI > ... basically allows anything that is an xlink is a LEIRI > ... svg doesn't need to update anything, we should say links are > IRI:s > ... svg doesn't have to talk about LEIRI:s at all Why is that SVG doesn’t need to mention LEIRIs? There are references to XMLRIs in the spec at the moment, and since those have been removed from XLink 1.1 in favour of referencing RFC 3987bis (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-duerst-iri-bis-04.txt), don’t we need to reference that? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 8 August 2008 06:37:27 UTC