- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:02:35 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-67: StatingFormalDefinitions http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/67 Raised by: Alistair Miles On product: SKOS In the SKOS Reference Editor's Draft 23 December 2007 [1], the formal class and property definitions, and the integrity conditions, are stated in the main body of the document as prose. For example, from section 4.3: "skos:ConceptScheme has type Class." "skos:inScheme, skos:hasTopConcept habe type Object Property." "skos:ConceptScheme is Disjoint with skos:Concept." For example, from section 7.3: "The Domain and Range of skos:semanticRelation is skos:Concept." This style of stating the formal definitions is potentially confusing. To reduce confusion, should the formal definitions be stated instead using prose in some other style (e.g. as in the RDFS spec [2])? Or as triples, wherever possible? Or something else? [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20071223 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 15:02:37 UTC