Re: shapes-ISSUE-156 (property pair constraints): problems in the description of property pair constraints [SHACL Spec] from Holger Knublauch on 2016-04-28 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:24:10 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1b9596e4-bd8a-e8f3-f311-8fad89c58796@topquadrant.com>

This duplicate should be closed.

Holger


On 28/04/2016 17:11, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-156 (property pair constraints): problems in the description of property pair constraints [SHACL Spec]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/156
>
> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
> On product: SHACL Spec
>
> The descriptions of the property pair constraints have multiple problems.
>
> They do not match the definition of property constraints because they are not about the singular object of triples.
>
> The are not allowed for inverse property constraints although they work just as well for inverse property constraints as they do for property constraints.
>
> They refer to property values, which are not defined in the spec.
>
> They talk about an (ordered) pair of properties but do not take an (ordered) pair of properties as arguments.
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 07:24:42 UTC