Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness

> 
> So I'm not trying to prolong the argument. Yesterday's call seemed to settle it.
> I'm just trying to smooth out some potentially concerning phrasings, as  I pointed out.
> So that this kind of concern can be avoided when future readers might "appreciate" OWA, they need to be informed that "yes, but that's what this is".

Sorry, "yes, but that's NOT what this is".


> 
> -Tim

Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 16:50:37 UTC