- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:51:16 +0200
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hello , ACTION-2818 Investigate ISSUE-2341 and look for previous comments Continuing to follow the trail, there is some agreement from Dr. Olaf, some disagreement and it ends up at an action in the old (now frozen, member-only) tracker ACTION~1942 Summarize the use of different list syntaxes and to suggest a unified list syntax that will be used mail the svg wg list http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/track/actions/1942 linked from a mail from Cameron http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2008AprJun/0105.html I notice that, apparently as a result of that earlier discussion, SVGT1.2 has a clarifying section on Paced animation and complex types http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/animate.html#complexDistances while 1.1 does not have that section. It would seem to make sense to port over that section, as it provides useful clarifying details. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 15:51:18 UTC