- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:37:17 -0500
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Daniel, On Feb 24, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > Hi all, > this morning I've just updated the ontology and I see that it has changed a lot. > • We have a Roled class. I don't remember having discussed this change. > • Instantaneous event: I'm ok with that, since we discussed it on moday. > • Activity is under "Durable". Why?? > • qualified has dissapeared, and we have "involved" range Element AND Involvement? (I think this is a typo, it should be the union). I added qualified back in, I mistook qualified for the old qualifiable, which wasn't around long. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/59419250de25 > • I'm still unhappy with the TemporalEntity name. What about just "Time", or "Temporal"? > Now there are many classes with multiple parent classes, and there will be some unions. Will this be RL compliant? > > The rest of your concerns were in response to Paolo's feedback, ISSUE-302 and we will handle it as part of that. Regards, Tim > I haven't gone through all the mail discussions, since there were like 30 new this morning. But PLEASE, could we > have a wiki page or another ontology where we gather the feedback and discuss it within the prov-o team before > implementing to the ontology? Tha last one we had may have had some issues, but it was much more simple > and easy to read... > > Thanks, > > Daniel >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:50:36 UTC