Re: [ACTION-43] (sdp related objects and global namespace) - way forward

Le mercredi 27 juin 2012 à 11:09 +0200, Stefan Hakansson LK a écrit :
> On 06/27/2012 08:15 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> > Le mardi 26 juin 2012 à 20:20 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit :
> >> Well, PeerConnection.localDescription and .remoteDescription would have
> >> to be changed aswell since they are SessionDescription attributes, and
> >> attributes cannot be dictionaries in WebIDL.
> >
> > Good point, I had missed that; I guess they would have to be declared as
> > "object" with their actual structure defined in the prose.
> 
> So would not that be the same as what the SessionDescriptionCallback is 
> provided with, e.g. an object à la {sdp:"m=lotsofmumbo", type:"offer"}?

Exactly, yes.

Dom

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 07:30:41 UTC