- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:40:17 -0400
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>, member-exi-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:04 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: > XSD couldn't capture context-dependent constraints. XSD 1.1 has some support for this. > > Note that this is experience from a while back. It's not impossible > that in the meantime XML Schema 1.1 may have addressed a number of > these issues. Also, the lack of interoperability in XML Schema > processors did exclude some more creative constructs that we looked at > (which ones, I don't recall). That's something that ought to be a lot > better today. Yes, things are better today. > My experience with binarising SVG is that you gain most from custom > codecs (or by changing the syntax, which is essentially the same) and > less than you'd hope from the structural redundancy. One difference (as of course you know) between EXI and some of the others is that one could have e.g. a degooper that generated SAX events, with nary a pointy bracket in sight. Overall, using EXI with serialized HTML 5 might also be a worth-while goal, including embedded mathml and svg. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 15:42:14 UTC