- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:33:59 -0500
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 19:19 +0000, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2011, at 19:14, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> >> The obvious way of getting those into two slots is now to define a “compatibility lexical space” and “compatibility L2V mapping” for rdf:langString. The effect would be that "chat"@en has a normal “RDF lexical form” (“chat”) and a “compatibility lexical form” (“chat@en”). The latter is not part of RDF graphs, but it can be used in “compatibility graphs” or whatever you want to call the two-slot representation.
> >
> > That makes sense. I wonder if anyone feels motivated to do it....
>
> Well, ask them – see subject line ;-)
Yeah, OWL folks were asked yesterday if they saw any technical problems
with it, to start. We'll see how that goes.
I think it should actually be this group which does the revision,
though. They (or "we" in the sense of a group that included me) only
stepped in and did it because this group wasn't here at the time. It
wasn't so much 'squatting' as doing building maintenance between
tenants.
-- Sandro
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 19:34:11 UTC