- From: Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH) <momartin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 00:51:19 +0000
- To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>, "Glenn Adams (glenn@skynav.com)" <glenn@skynav.com>
Glenn, This proposal sounds like an acceptable solution - c/element/timed element. Monica -----Original Message----- From: Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 7:14 PM To: public-tt@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-187: R0006 is overly constraining as drafted [Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions] ISSUE-187: R0006 is overly constraining as drafted [Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/187 Raised by: Glenn Adams On product: Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions R0006 says "A document must have all elements are in order of time. That is, in a par context, an element must not lexically precede another element with an earlier start time." Clearly this is wrong, as there are elements that are not timed that may precede a timed element. For example, a <tt:meta/> or a <tt:set/> may lexically precede another element. One solution is to substitute "timed element" for "element" in R0006, with a note that defines a "timed element".
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 00:52:05 UTC