- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:52:30 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 09:56 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
[...]
> > ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in
> > the HTML 5 spec
>
> Michael(tm) Smith ensured that Ian Hickson follows up... last year
>
> I suggested that this item be closed given that we have not received any
> feedback, but DanC objected.
Let's see... that was
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/26-html-wg-minutes.html#item01
Perhaps I advised against closing it during the discussion...
("objected" suggests you put a question and I formally objected...)
> We are now into the second quarter of this
> year... is there any reason why this can't be closed now?
If you see a critical mass in favor of the current design, then
no, I don't see any reason why not.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 09:52:50 UTC