Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML] from Timothy Lebo on 2012-07-10 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from July 2012)

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:36:23 -0400
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <120D5E19-5E49-4D4E-8EC8-18C0DA7A354C@rpi.edu>

Paul,

There already is RDFa in the document. It states prov-o assertions.

http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/extract?format=turtle&uri=https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html

What other assertions would you like to sneak in (besides the un-role-able attributions)?

BTW, I tried to follow PAQ to state that the document had provenance at the above URL, but it broke RDFa validation, so I had to remove it.

Thanks,
Tim

On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Paul Groth wrote:

> -- I guess eventually we may add some rdfa in the document?

Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 20:36:52 UTC