- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:24:47 -0500
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 10:05 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > Dan Connolly writes: [...] > > Is it just me, or does this seem like a map/territory bug, to others? > > There are languages and there are documents that specify/describe > > languages, but those classes don't intersect, do they? > > No probably not. But we've accepted puns similar to this in the past, > particular wrt namespaces themselves. . . > > > The httpRange-14 issue is closed, but I wonder if this is new > > information that motivates taking another look. > > Let's not be hasty -- do we have any extant examples of languages > which _do_ publish separate URIs for the language and the spec.? Do > any of these use the 302 response for the language URI? What, for > example, is the URI which identifies HTML? N3? Python? The N3 language seems to be called http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/grammar/n3#language The 303 redirect stuff is almost always more trouble than it's worth. I can't think of any cases other than legacy when I'd recommend it. Using doc#term is much more straightforward. I can't think of any URIs for HTML nor python. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 18:24:55 UTC