- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:39:26 -0500
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 14:03 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 14:38 -0400, Ben Adida wrote: > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > I think you missed a subtlety. > > > Any GRDDL result of ?NSDOC is a result of ?D by the 1st bullet. > > > > So this means that you can declare a namespaceTransformation in the > > instance document? I guess that doesn't hurt, but it's fairly confusing. > > I'm not sure what the value of this generalized formalization is. > > I think there's a reason, but I'm not sure I remember it. > I was in quite a fugue when I came up with this formulation, > and I'm not sure I can return to that state this week. > I hope I can explain it in due course. On second thought, I think you're right. But I'm not sure yet, so I'm not going to change it just now. > Meanwhile, as you say, the current draft specification > doesn't hurt. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Saturday, 21 October 2006 05:39:36 UTC