- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:18:04 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 03:00 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I am still awaiting a substantive response to my last-call response of 22 > February 2006 on SPARQL Query Language for RDF, W3C Working Draft 20 > February 2006, http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220/. > > I believe that the comments in this message raise substantive technical > issues that need to be addressed before SPARQL becomes a W3C > recommendation. Indeed, these are still pending. We have started looking over them in detail, making test cases out of the detailed examples (well, 1 of them, so far). Also, the editors are considering some large-scale editorial changes. The WG is moving particularly slowly this month... taking a bit of a holiday. But please do stay tuned for a reply in substance. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 14:19:03 UTC