- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:06:44 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 14:39 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > In response to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Apr/0016.html > (excerpted below), I would be very disappointed if concerns related to any > ambiguity in the SPARQL documents were *not* brought up in > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org. > > In my view admonishments to the contrary should either firmly repudiated or > the working group should officially monitor and report on the fora to which > such comments have been redirected. No comments on the SPARQL specs have been redirected, as far as I can see. Comments on "the implementation of SPARQLer (ARQ)" were directed to another forum. > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > > > > [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Apr/0016.html] > > From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com> > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:04:00 +0100 > Message-ID: <DF5E364A470421429AE6DC96979A4F6F99A75A@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net> > To: Jorge Pérez <jperez@utalca.cl> > Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org> > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > From: Jorge Pérez <mailto:jperez@utalca.cl> > > Date: 18 April 2006 17:18 > > ... > > > Thanks again for your time, I will start with another thread to discuss > > about some *problems* (from my point of view) in the implementation of > > SPARQLer (ARQ) that reflects other ambiguities in the definitions of > > the last draft. > > > > > > > > - Jorge > > This is the DAWG working group comments list. Please send ARQ bug reports to jena-dev@groups.yahoo.com > > http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/support_request.html > > Andy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 19:06:49 UTC