- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:42:15 -0500
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, Yosi Scharf <syosi@mit.edu>
FYI, there's another test case available to study: Roman numeral test Dave Beckett (Monday, 8 August) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0228.html -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman.rq http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman.n3 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/roman-result.n3 Yosi, if you could look at that soon, I'd appreciate it. The valueTesting issue (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#valueTesting ) is on the agenda for tomorrow's teleconference, and it would be nice to have input from the cwm/swap project in hand. Also, the WG approved a relevant test last week: extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3 though since we approved it, my understanding of the issue has changed and in any case the #valueTesting issue remains open. Ah... elsewhere I see mail from EricP "at risk in the interval 8 Aug to 18 Aug" Hmm. EricP, I guess I consider you at-risk for tomorrow's DAWG teleconference. I didn't realize that when I put the agenda together. If the uncertainty around the risk resolves either way, please let me know. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 18:42:21 UTC