- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:33:59 -0500
- To: Ron Alford <ronwalf@umd.edu>
- Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, Amy Alford <aloomis@glue.umd.edu>
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 22:04 -0400, Ron Alford wrote: > After consulting with the lab, we have decided that the namespace > splitting proposal (_!:...) is the best way to deal with the use cases > that have been brought up. > > While we believe that the protocol prebinding is nice and generally > useful, we would prefer a syntax level solution to the bnode problem. > > The function extension (ext:bnodelabel) comes in a distant third. It > adds annoying overhead to templating queries. We were also concerned > with how well implementations will deal with function extensions. And what of the "Dynamically assign identifiers" option? I'm interested to know whether you find it acceptable. > So I drop my original comment suggestions in favor of either namespace > splitting or prebinding. The function extensions have yet to convince > me, but there's still room. > > > Finally, I'd like to thank Amy Alford, Kendall Clark, and Bijan Parsia > for all their help and input into this issue. I'd also like to thank > the members of the dawg who've been so responsive to this issue both on > the list and in IRC. > > -Ron -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 11 July 2005 16:34:05 UTC