- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:05:40 -0500
- To: public-cwm-bugs@w3.org
- Cc: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
cwm comes up empty on... python cwm.py http://norman.walsh.name/2005/projects/xslflickr.doap --n3 The server says it's application/xml and the file doesn't start with rdf:RDF but doap:Project. Should cwm have a flag for this? The spec says "If the content is known to be RDF/XML by context, such as when RDF/XML is embedded inside other XML content, then the grammar can either start at Element Event RDF (only when an element is legal at that point in the XML) or at production nodeElementList (only when element content is legal, since this is a list of elements)." connolly@dirk:/tmp$ HEAD http://norman.walsh.name/2005/projects/xslflickr.doap 200 OK Connection: close Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:02:43 GMT Accept-Ranges: bytes ETag: "18c32c3-65f-427009e2" Server: Apache/1.3.31 (Unix) DAV/1.0.3 mod_gzip/1.3.26.1a PHP/4.3.10 mod_ssl/2.8.19 OpenSSL/0.9.6c Content-Length: 1631 Content-Type: application/xml Last-Modified: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:53:38 GMT Client-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:02:43 GMT Client-Peer: 205.196.222.168:80 Client-Response-Num: 1 Hmm... the canonical DOAP thingy seems to be text/plain. Or is that just a "view source" copy? Is there a more official doap-doap.rdf somewhere? connolly@dirk:/tmp$ HEAD http://svn.usefulinc.com/svn/repos/trunk/doap/examples/doap-doap.rdf 200 OK Connection: close Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:42:38 GMT Accept-Ranges: bytes ETag: "1//trunk/doap/examples/doap-doap.rdf" Server: Apache/2.0.53 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.1.1 PHP/4.3.10-10ubuntu4 mod_scgi/1.2 mod_ssl/2.0.53 OpenSSL/0.9.7e Vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent Content-Length: 4713 Content-Type: text/plain Client-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:42:38 GMT Client-Peer: 205.196.209.231:80 Client-Response-Num: 1 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 14:05:59 UTC