- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:21:57 +0100
- To: public-xml-id@w3.org
Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 à 15:01 -0500, Elliotte Harold a écrit :
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
>
> > IMHO this should be raised as a bug in XML Canonicalization v 1.0
>
> I'd call it a design flaw. At this point in time, I'm not sure we can
> get away with calling it a bug and issuing an erratum.
An other option, like with many bugs, is to call it a feature :-) ...
For xml:id, that would mean using another namespace (and another prefix)
than the XML namespace. Probably not ideal, but maybe an option to
consider?
My 0.02 ¤
Eric
--
Curious about Relax NG? Read my book online.
http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 24 January 2005 20:22:38 UTC