Re: [Filter Effects] 'filter' property, SVG and filter functions

Hi Dirk,

Thanks. I have created an AI on tracker to address your comments:

https://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/actions/74

Cheers,
-v

On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:28 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:

> 
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> It was more a question if we have to take care about this. This is the definition of the 'filter' property in SVG 1.1:
>>> 
>>> Value: <funciri> | none | inherit
>>> 
>>> in comparison to Filter Effects 1.0:
>>> 
>>> Value:          none | <filter-function> [ <filter-function> ]*
>>> 
>>> I thought about:
>>> 
>>> Value: none | inherit | [<filter-function> | <funciri>]+
>> 
>> As you noted, <funciri> is listed in the spec as a type of
>> <filter-function>, so the last two are equivalent.
> Yes they are.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Note that 'inherit' is currently missing.
>> 
>> CSS properties no longer list 'inherit' in their value descriptions;
>> global values are described in Values & Units instead.
> Ah interesting, I didn't know about that so far (for the records: [1]).
> 
> 
> Some more suggested changes:
> 
> * I think there is a small typo in "5.1. How the ‘filter’ property property applies to content formatted with the CSS box model (e.g HTML)":
> 
> "The application of the ‘filter property’ property"
> 
> I assume that it should just be 'filter' property?
> 
> * Same later with "The description of the ‘filter element’ element follows:" (continues in this and the next section of the spec).
> 
> * For consistency, the value 'inherit' should be removed from other properties in the same spec, this affects ‘enable-background’, ‘flood-color’, ‘flood-opacity’ and 'lightning-color'.
> 
> * Issues should use the class "issue" instead of "specissue" (or "specissue" should be defined in the style sheet). The prefix "ISSUE: " can than get removed from the text.
> 
> * The term <css-3d-transform> should be replaced by <css-transform>:
> 
> <transform>	<css-3d-transform> | <mat>
> <css-3d-transform>	<transform-function>;[<transform-function>]
> 
> * Link to the correct transform spec. At the moment it is CSS3 3D Transforms:
> 
> <css-3d-transform>	Follows the CSS 3D transform interpolation rules.
> 
> Greetings,
> Dirk
> 
>> 
>> ~TJ
> 
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/#component-types

Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 15:36:25 UTC