implementations for the interop. status report paper

Hi,

As the Interoperability Status Report paper will show the current
implementations, it would be nice to reflect also if they are commercial
applications or intended to be published as open source.

Suggestions about the notation ["intended open source"/"commercial"] are
welcome...

And could you guys check that the implementation names do satisfy you
also? :)

Implementation			Client	Server	Type

Trinity College Dublin 		YES 	NO 	intended open source
Tommy Lindberg			YES	YES	intended open source
Entrust Inc.			YES	YES	commercial
Oracle Corporation		YES	NO	commercial
Apache Software Foundation	YES	YES	intended open source
DataPower Technology, Inc.	YES	NO	commercial
SQLData Systems			YES	YES	intended open source

Cheers,
 - -Guillermo

Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:45:42 UTC