[closed]: OWL comment - language subsets and complexity from Dan Connolly on 2003-06-20 (public-webont-comments@w3.org from June 2003)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 20 Jun 2003 13:10:29 -0500
To: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1056132628.8713.649.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 11:10, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> Ian,
> 
> Thank you for your response.
> 
> It is a shame that it is not possible to close these "loopholes", and reduce the
> complexity levels for the two subsets, without unacceptable restrictions.
> However, I accept that the proposed tradeoff is the best that the working group
> can achieve and accept your response as satisfactory.
>
> Dave Reynolds

[...]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 14:09:58 UTC