RE: ISSUE-41/ACTION-97 decentralized-extensibility

On Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:34 AM, I wrote:
> On Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:44 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > Adrian Bateman wrote:
> > > Tony Ross has picked up this action. It's closely related to planning
> > > work he has already started. We intend to send a proposal to the
> > > working group before the end of September. I believe a status of OPEN
> > > is appropriate given that we are actively working on this issue. If
> > > the group prefers to close the action and set the status of the issue
> > > to raised until we submit that feedback we wouldn't object to that
> > either.
> >
> > The action can be OPEN and the issue status can be RAISED.  I believe
> > that that would effectively represent the current status, per the
> > definition of RAISED:
> >
> > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/#head-
> > 47c0b55d661dcf93f76d586ddbe292c9abc597e4
> >
> > Not being familiar with Tony Ross, if you are OK with it, I would
> > prefer to keep the action assigned to you (Adrian).
> 
> I'm okay with both of those.

Tony has written up our thoughts on Distributed (or Decentralized) Extensibility in the attached HTML document. Tony is on vacation so I am posting on his behalf.

We have included a base proposal with several optional components. The purpose of this document is to seed a discussion and we expect the discussion to drive improvements in the document.

Regards,

Adrian.