- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 29 Mar 2002 13:36:03 -0600
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 12:18, Dave Beckett wrote: [...] > We should not be testing for something with an undefined answer! My considered opinion is that the answer is defined by RFC 2396; "relfile" relative to mailto:foo@bar is mailto:relfile. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/irclog-2002-02-26.html#T09-02-13 I regret that I cannot write a more detailed response, nor investigate the state of this matter (whether the WG has already decided on it or not) without putting my other obligations at risk for the next week or so. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 14:37:00 UTC