- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:48:05 +0100
- To: "Jon Ferraiolo" <jonf@adobe.com>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
* Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
>This is a follow-on response in attempt to close discussion on the
>original LC comment you submitted via:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Apr/0233.html
>and which I was the last person to complain that the text is not yet
>good enough:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Apr/0233.html
>
>Here is proposed new wording from the SVG WG on the topic which we hope
>expresses the processing model for 'foreignObject' clearly:
>
>---------------
>The user agent must treat all of the content within a 'foreignObject' as
>foreign content which is to be handed off to an appropriate content
>handler for rendering. User agents are not required to support any
>particular content types via 'foreignObject'. In particular, user agents
>are not required to support SVG content embedded within or referenced by
>'foreignObject'; SVG content within 'foreignObject' represents an
>extension just as with any other type of content.
>---------------
If this means
<svg ...>
<foreignObject ...>
<svg ...>
is allowed, then that does not address my concern as the schema still
prohibes this. If this is not allowed then it seems this is now even
less clear than before.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 28 December 2005 22:47:42 UTC