- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:06:24 +0000
- To: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
- CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 22 Mar 2013, at 12:31, "Tom De Nies" <tom.denies@ugent.be<mailto:tom.denies@ugent.be>> wrote: Hello all, the proposal to resolve this issue is to add the prefix "prov:" to all the prov-n dictionary notations, analogous to what was done for PROV-Links. This would make the extension valid. If any members of the WG have an objection to this, we ask kindly to inform us by replying to this email. If no objections are received before Tuesday March 26th, we will assume this resolution is accepted, - Tom 2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org<mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/640 Raised by: Tom De Nies On product: PROV-DICTIONARY Originally raised by Luc and Stian in their review, but was considered non-blocking after adding a remark to the document. For the next draft, we need to resolve this. http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-n/#extensibility states: the predicate MUST be a qualifiedName with a non-empty prefix. However, we will be using the prov namespace. How do we proceed?
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 13:08:00 UTC