Re: EBNF grammar of presentation syntax

Dear Axel,

I acknowledge receipt of the email and agree with the (partial)  
solution.
This is the simple and natural correction, and believe general enough  
for most purposes.

However, notice that in this way is not possible to use arbitrary  
UNICODESTRINGs in names, NCNames only
(some sentences in the documents produced by the WG assume general  
strings).
So, there are some documents that can be expressed in the exchange  
syntax (i.e. XML) which cannot be represented in the
presentation syntax. I don't know if this is a problem or not.

Best regards,

Carlos Viegas Damásio



Em 2009/09/19, às 13:50, Axel Polleres escreveu:

> Dear Carlos,
>
> Thanks for spotting this. We have updated the EBNF productions in  
> RIF FLD and BLD to only
> allow NCNames (instead of arbitrary unicode strings) for localnames,  
> Prefix names,
> Variable names and Profiles names, cf. [1,2,3]
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-rif-comments@w3.org 
> >
> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment  
> please let us
> know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's  
> response to your
> comment.
>
> with best regards,
> Axel
>
> 1. http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/FLD#EBNF_Grammar_for_the_Presentation_Syntax_of_RIF-FLD
> 2. http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/BLD#EBNF_Grammar_for_the_Presentation_Syntax_of_RIF-BLD_.28Informative.29
> 3. http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#Shortcuts_for_Constants_in_RIF.27s_Presentation_Syntax
>
> -- 
> Dr. Axel Polleres
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of  
> Ireland, Galway
> email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 13:28:41 UTC