- From: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:45:44 +0100
- To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
El 13/12/16 a las 22:27, Krzysztof Janowicz escribió: >> I don't agree with this statement in section 5.1: "SOSA defines those >> classes and properties for which data that can be safely exchanged >> across all uses of the SSN". If SOSA does not cover the whole SSN >> ontology, it cannot ensure interoperability at that level. > > Thanks for your comments Raul. You are reading the sentence the other > way around. What it is intended to state is that services that offer > data based on SOSA alone and those that offer data based on the full SSN > can exchange data on the level of SOSA, i.e., they can inter-operate on > issues that involve observations and their results and so forth but not > on the level of specific sensor capabilities or networks of sensors as > those are defined in SSN but not SOSA. In fact, such core > ontologies/patterns play a great role in acting as a minimal > interoperability fallback level for multiple ontologies in that the > involved parties merely need to agree on common patterns (and > reoccurrence is the very nature of patterns) instead of entire ontologies. Thanks for the clarification. Now I get it. However, if the paragraph has been misunderstood by one person (me), it could be by others. I would suggest to rewrite that part along the lines stated in your explanation. Kind regards, > On 12/13/2016 01:08 PM, Raúl García Castro wrote: >> El 12/12/16 a las 14:06, Kerry Taylor escribió: >>> To the best of my knowledge ssn is now stable and awaits your review >>> prior to the vote to publish a fresh working draft at the F2F. In the >>> last few days there >>> >>> Has been work on tidying up issue-105 and the changes section (myself) , >>> extending the section on modularity and sosa by Krzysztof, and the >>> automated description of sosa together with relevant issue documentation >>> by Armin. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please have a look! >>> >>> -Kerry >>> >> >> Dear all, >> >> Here you have some comments on the current SSN Editor's Draft. >> >> The two paragraphs before figure 1 seem to be a bit out of scope for >> the specification and may be a bit confusing for the intended audience >> of the document. The discussion about decidability for modules seems >> too much when we are just using owl:import, and some statements are >> not quite understandable (e.g., "concepts in the ontology module that >> inherit object properties", what is a "concept" in OWL and how can it >> inherit a property?). >> >> Besides, now we just have vertical segmentation. Why not removing that >> header since we are mainly owl:import-ing modules? >> >> In figure 1, some of the owl:imports relationships that appear in the >> figure are redundant and add confusion to the figure. If SSN-O&M >> imports SSN and SSN already imports SOSA, there is no need for SSN-O&M >> to import SOSA. If DUL-A imports SSN-O&M and SSN-O&M already imports >> SSN, there is no need for DUL-A to import SSN. Without the redundant >> relationships, we have a simple layered view on the modules. >> >> The document in its current state really needs figures. I volunteer to >> provide some figures of the different ontology modules similar to the >> ones I made for the old SSN. >> >> Section 4 (The SSN ontology) is not stated to be normative or not; I >> suppose that it is normative. Then, it is very strange that the >> standard ontology imports another non-normative ontology. Either SOSA >> is normative or we have to reconsider the relationship between both. >> >> Besides, if SOSA is the core module of the ontology, it should be >> presented first. >> >> I don't agree with this statement in section 5.1: "SOSA defines those >> classes and properties for which data that can be safely exchanged >> across all uses of the SSN". If SOSA does not cover the whole SSN >> ontology, it cannot ensure interoperability at that level. >> >> The SSN-O&M Alignment module is not explained in the document. We >> would need at least a placeholder for it wouldn't we? >> >> Kind regards, >> > > -- Dr. Raúl García Castro http://www.garcia-castro.com/ Ontology Engineering Group Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid Phone: +34 91 336 65 96 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2016 06:46:15 UTC