- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:51:02 -0500
- To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Satya, Does the latest DM address your concern? May we close this issue? Thanks, Tim On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi, > > Generation and usage have both optional id: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage > > Luc > > On 05/03/12 13:45, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/288 >> >> Raised by: Satya Sahoo >> On product: mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o >> >> If activity id is optional for generation record, why is it not so for usage record? These two points need to be reconciled either way. (Satya) >> >> Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into the "attribute" list. (Satya) >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 14:51:35 UTC