RE: Close ISSUE-45, multiple recipients of signature? from Scott Cantor on 2009-04-06 (public-xmlsec@w3.org from April 2009)

From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:35:02 -0400
To: "'Frederick Hirsch'" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, "'XMLSec WG Public List'" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045701c9b710$51992300$f4cb6900$@2@osu.edu>

Frederick Hirsch wrote on 2009-04-06:
> If you disagree, please post a proposed rationale and corresponding
> suggested specification change.

Not that I'm arguing for it, but it's probably the HMAC case where you might
want to use multiple signing keys, and I suppose it could be supported by
adding multiple SignatureValue elements with Recipient attributes, or
something along those lines.

-- Scott

Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 23:35:47 UTC