RE: wiki page re: issue-262 (was Re: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call)

Dear all,

 

Please find bellow a proposal for issue-262. I assumed that there is a "G" response that we discussed in a previous call even though  I did not find anything about that in the current documents.

 

Normative text:

For Servers in direct communication with the User Agent that then communicate further with other parties within the same interaction but outside direct communication with the User Agent:

·         If they share tracking data about the interaction those servers SHOULD send a "G" response 

·         If they do not share tracking data about the interaction those servers SHOULD send a "N" response.

 

 

Sorry for the short notice before the call.

 

Best regards,

 

Vincent

 

De : Nicholas Doty [mailto:npdoty@w3.org] 
Envoyé : mercredi 19 novembre 2014 07:13
À : TOUBIANA Vincent
Cc : Tracking Protection Working Group
Objet : wiki page re: issue-262 (was Re: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call)

 

I believe we're still waiting for specific text proposals on any changes to TPE in order to facilitate tracking status resources/responses from gateways and ad exchanges. I've created this wiki page for people to collect proposals:

        https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges 

I've added a link to Shane's text about consent (though I suspect that would actually be a Compliance change). Feel free to add more proposals there, although also send to the mailing list so that everyone can see.

Hope this helps, 
Nick 

On November 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, TOUBIANA Vincent <vtoubiana@cnil.fr> wrote: 

> I have to send regrets for today's call beacause I'll be travelling. Regarding issue-262, do we have a wiki page where we can compare the different proposals and add a new one?

> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> Vincent 
> 

 

<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>I believe we're still waiting for specific text proposals on any changes to TPE in order to facilitate tracking status resources/responses from gateways and ad exchanges. I've created this wiki page for people to collect proposals:</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre">     </span><a href="https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges">https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges</a></div><div><br></div><div>I've added a link to Shane's text about consent (though I suspect that would actually be a Compliance change). Feel free to add more proposals there, although also send to the mailing list so that everyone can see.</div><div><br></div><div>Hope this helps,</div><div>Nick</div><br><div><div>On November 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, TOUBIANA Vincent &lt;<a href="mailto:vtoubiana@cnil.fr">vtoubiana@cnil.fr</a>&gt <mailto:vtoubiana@cnil.fr%3c/a%3e&gt> ; wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">

 

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> 
<meta name="Generator" content="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1"> 
<title>RE: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call</title> 

<div> 
<!-- Converted from text/plain format --><p><font size="2">I have to send regrets for today's call beacause I'll be travelling. Regarding issue-262, do we have a wiki page where we can compare the different proposals and add a new one?<br>

<br> 
Best regards,<br> 
<br> 
Vincent<br></font></p></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>

Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 15:22:54 UTC