Re: Some comments on OWL S

It's what I expected. Thanks!

Yuzhong Qu

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
To: "Yuzhong Qu" <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: Some comments on OWL S


> Yuzhong Qu wrote:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.html
> 
> > 1. 
> > 
> > [2.1. Ontologies 
> > 
> > There are two built-in classes in OWL,....
> > The class with identifier owl:Thing is the class 
>  > of all individuals, and is part of OWL Lite.
>  > The class with identifier owl:Nothing is the empty class.
> > ...
> > ]
> > 
> > It should be explicitly specified whether or not owl:Nothing 
>  > is included in OWL Lite.
> > It would be nice and elegant to include owl:Nothing 
>  > in OWL Lite if there is no harm to do so.
> > 
> 
> In the telecon of May 1 the Working Group has decided to
> add owl:Nothing to OWL Lit. Appropriate changes are being
> made to the editor's drafts to reflect this decision.
> 
> Please  let us know whether this response is satisfactory.
> 
> Thanks again for your comments.
> 
> Guus Schreiber
> Webont co-chair
> 
>  > [..]
> -- 
> NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003
> 
> Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
> De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
> E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
> Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 09:27:28 UTC