RE: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques]

I would vote for SHOULD

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Johnathan Nightingale
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 12:39 PM
To: Web Security Context Working Group WG
Subject: Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY?
[Techniques]


As the one who raised it, I suppose I should chime in.

My opinion, as expressed on the call, is that it should be MAY in  
both cases.  I don't think we should mandate (MUST) or even recommend  
(SHOULD) the use of identity signals which currently have no  
standardized validation methodology.  I think it's entirely  
appropriate and worthwhile, however, to call logotype support to the  
attention of would-be implementors, should they elect to use it (MAY).

Is this the straw poll Mez wanted?

Cheers,

J


On 8-Aug-07, at 12:51 PM, Web Security Context Working Group Issue  
Tracker wrote:

>
> ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY?  
> [Techniques]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/
>
> Raised by: Thomas Roessler
> On product: Techniques
>
> Should support for the display of logotypes be listed as a MAY or a  
> SHOULD?
>
> a) in primary chrome?
> b) in secondary chrome?
>
>
>
>

---
Johnathan Nightingale
Human Shield
johnath@mozilla.com

Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 16:46:30 UTC